Cases 61 - 70 of 262
BEAN et al v. FCA US LLC et al
as 3:2019cv00076
Plaintiff:
VIRGIL BROWN, GARY ROWAN, DORIS BROWN and others
Defendant:
VM MOTORI S.p.A., VM NORTH AMERICA, INC, FCA US LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Agurcia et al v. Republica De Honduras et al
as 8:2019cv00038
Plaintiff:
Leslie B Solt, Barrett Handlon, Lyn Macbeth and others
Petitioner:
Yvette S Rovira
Defendant:
Empresa Nacional De Energia Electrica, Instituto De La Propiedad and Republica De Honduras
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv24616
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Swearingen v. AT&T Mobility, LLC.
as 3:2017cv01242
Defendant:
AT&T Mobility, LLC. and AT&T Mobility Services, LLC
Plaintiff:
Gary L. Swearingen
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Central States et al v. Rinker et al
as 6:2017mc00008
Defendant:
Rinker, Gary Rinker, LaSalle County Development Corp. and others
Plaintiff:
Central States, Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund and Arthur H. Bunte, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 754
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2018cv00942
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Mediator:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Johnson v. Collecto, Inc.
as 6:2018cv00498
Plaintiff:
Gary Johnson
Defendant:
Collecto, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2018cv80270
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Batista v. Kavulich & Associates, PC et al
as 2:2018cv00023
Plaintiff:
Rosario Batista
Defendant:
Kavulich & Associates, PC, Gary Kavulich and 2524, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
James v. OneUnited Bank, N.A.
as 1:2017cv24415
Plaintiff:
Gary James
Defendant:
OneUnited Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
