Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Kone et al v. Islamic Republic of Iran
as 1:2023cv05790
Lead Plaintiff:
Mama Kone
Plaintiff:
Celestine Kone, Lacina Kone, Stephen Ciccone and others
Defendant:
Islamic Republic of Iran
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2333 Civil Remedies: Anti-Terrorism Act of 1991
Government Employees Insurance Company et al v. Waldman et al
as 1:2022cv02858
Plaintiff:
Government Employees Insurance Company, GEICO Indemnity Company, GEICO General Insurance Company and others
Defendant:
Mel Waldman, Ph.D., MW Psychology, P.C., MWaldman Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Thomas et al v. Beech-Nut Nutrition Company
as 1:2021cv00133
Plaintiff:
Emily Bigaouette, Jen MacLeod, Laura Eggnatz and others
Defendant:
Beech-Nut Nutrition Company
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Dominick Grossi, Michael Motherway, Emily Baccari and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Keita v. IBM et al
as 1:2017cv01276
Defendant:
Apple, BMW Manhattan, CBS and others
Plaintiff:
Mohammed Keita
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Chanel Inc. v. The Partnership, et al
as 1:2014mc00406
Plaintiff:
Chanel Inc.
Defendant:
The Partnership, et al
Cause Of Action: M 18-302 Registration of Foreign Judgment
Government Employees Insurance Company et al v. Margulis, Ph.D et al
as 1:2012cv03562
Defendant:
American Psychological Care, P.C., Comprehensive Psychological Evaluation, P.C., Andriy Kostynyuk and others
Plaintiff:
Geico Casualty Company,, Geico General Insurance Company, Geico Indemnity Company, and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Chanel, Inc. et al v. Jin et al
as 1:2011mc00056
Plaintiff:
Chanel, Inc. and Louis Vuitton Malletier, S.A.
Defendant:
Doudou Jin, Yuhong Xie, Zhenhua Cui and others
Cause Of Action: M 18-302 Registration of Foreign Judgment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
