Cases 1 - 10 of 659
Mueller v. Clore, et al.
as 24-4964
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER C. MUELLER
Defendant:
MARK NOOTH, Institution Administrator - O.D.O.C - Salem, OR, ROBERT CLORE, ATTORNEY, Institution Counselor - D.R.C.I - Madras, OR, Mr. BOYER, Correctional Services Mgr. - D.R.C.I - Madras, OR and others
Crispin v. Sussel
as 24-2094
Defendant:
BIGA, Counselor, JOHN DOE, #1, PEIREAULT and others
Plaintiff:
JOSSEAN CRISPIN
Erakat v. United States Internal Revenue Service, et al.
as 24-4461
Defendant:
SUPPLEMENTAL SECURITY INCOME, Administrative Taxpayer Advocate, UTAHA, CDCR Counselor, UNITED STATES INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, IRS Fresno and others
Plaintiff:
AHMAD ERAKAT
Jackson v. Tampkins, et al.
as 24-4272
Defendant:
P. ALVIDREZ, CCI, Correctional Counselor, individual; official capacity, V. GOESLING, CCI, Correctional Counselor, individual; official capacity, P. GARCIA, Acting Chairperson, individual; official capacity and others
Plaintiff:
CARLUS JACKSON
Nguyen v. Williams, et al.
as 24-3844
Plaintiff:
DAI NGUYEN
Defendant:
K. WILLIAMS, Counselor, CC2, D. ZEPEDA, Counselor, D. GRAY, Counselor and others
Burrell v. Bell
as 24-1390
Plaintiff:
AKO K. BURRELL
Defendant:
EARL BELL, Superintendent CCF, WEBB, Education Supervisor of CCF, KING, Deputy Superintendent of Programs and others
Rhodes v. Ford
as 24-3106
Plaintiff:
KAVIN MAURICE RHODES
Defendant:
D. FORD, LTA, D. LUNSFORD, SSA, K. ROYAL and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02200
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Ewalan v. Washington Department of Corrections, et al.
as 24-2918
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH LOCHUCH EWALAN
Defendant:
WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ROTHWELL, Sergeant G-Unit B-Side, DICKERSON, Sergeant and others
El v. Chun
as 24-1142
Defendant:
BLAIR, JOSEPH FUCITO, Sergeant PETER LITRA, Shield #1197 and others
Plaintiff:
SAGE EL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
