Cases 1 - 10 of 236
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv08072
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv07984
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv06516
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
ARMSTRONG v. MORGAN STANLEY SMITH BARNEY, LLC.
as 3:2024cv00691
Petitioner:
CHRISTOPHER R. ARMSTRONG
Respondent:
MORGAN STANLEY SMITH BARNEY, LLC
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0010 Petition to Vacate Arbitration Award
SMITH v. FRANKLIN CREDIT MANAGEMENT CORPORATION
as 2:2024cv00709
Plaintiff:
AMELIA SMITH
Defendant:
FRANKLIN CREDIT MANAGEMENT CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00408
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv23351
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv21360
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv14255
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
BLAIR-SMITH v. CAESARS ENTERTAINMENT, INC., et al
as 1:2023cv06506
Plaintiff:
MONICA BLAIR-SMITH
Defendant:
CAESARS ENTERTAINMENT, INC.,, BOARDWALK REGENCY LLC d/b/a CAESARS ATLANTIC CITY HOTEL & CASINO, HARD ROCK INTERNATIONAL INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Anti-trust
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
