Cases 1 - 10 of 13,983
Ellison v. Thornell, et al.
as 24-3527
Petitioner:
CHARLES DAVID ELLISON
Respondent:
RYAN THORNELL, DIRECTOR OF THE ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, REHABILITATION, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections Rehabilitation and Reentry and JAMES O'NEIL, Warden - Arizona State Prison - Eyman Complex
Williams v. Baker, et al.
as 24-3525
Plaintiff:
SHANNON WILLIAMS
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER BAKER, PAUL COPENHAVER, Warden, BORJA, Officer and others
Corines v. The Westchester County Dept. of Correction
as 24-1509
Plaintiff:
PETER J. CORINES
Defendant:
COUNTY OF WESTCHESTER, as Owner, operator of the Westchester County Jail, CARL VOLLMER, Assistant Warden & Administrative Officer of the Jail, FRANCIS DELGROSSO, Assistant Warden & Chief Administrative Officer and others
Koklich, et al. v. Borders, et al.
as 24-3505
Plaintiff:
BRUCE KOKLICH, individually and as Class Representatives, HAROLD W. TAYLOR, DAVID M. ZIEMKE and others
Defendant:
DEAN BORDERS, Warden and Senior Administrative and Policy making Officer, individual and official capacity and CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, a California Public Entity
McGrady v. Montgomery County, Maryland
as 24-1491
Plaintiff:
DUANE MCGRADY
Defendant:
MONTGOMERY COUNTY, MARYLAND, STATE OF MARYLAND, MONTGOMERY COUNTY SHERIFF and others
John Smith, Jr.In re: John Smith, Jr.
as 24-1475
Petitioner:
In re: JOHN SMITH, JR.
Respondent:
KIM CARGOR, Warden
In re: Christopher Seckington
as 24-11848
Petitioner:
In re: CHRISTOPHER SECKINGTON
Respondent:
STATE OF FLORIDA, LANCASTER CI WARDEN and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Leibel v. Reubart, et al.
as 24-3395
Petitioner:
TATIANA LEIBEL
Respondent:
REUBART, Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Reynolds v. Quiros
as 24-1440
Plaintiff:
RICHARD REYNOLDS
Defendant:
ANGEL QUIROS, KRISTINE BARRONE, WILLIAM MULLIGAN and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
