Cases 21 - 30 of 1,604,209
Amado v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc., et al.
as 1:2024cv00606
Plaintiff:
Sarah Irene Amado
Defendant:
Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. and Kacy Lelievre
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Nevarez et al v. General Motors LLC
as 5:2024cv01079
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Nevarez and Yadir B. Nevarez
Defendant:
General Motors LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Guest v. TARGET CORPORATION
as 2:2024cv04210
Plaintiff:
Patrick Guest
Defendant:
TARGET CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
SAGAR v. DOLLAR TREE STORES, INC. et al
as 2:2024cv04218
Plaintiff:
KUNDA SAGAR
Defendant:
DOLLAR TREE STORES, INC. and ALEXANDRA RAMOS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Wohlfeiler v. Little Man Ice Cream, LLC
as 1:2024cv01432
Plaintiff:
Vicki Wohlfeiler
Defendant:
Little Man Ice Cream, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Spertini v. American Airlines, Inc.
as 1:2024cv21950
Plaintiff:
Carlos Eduardo Spertini
Defendant:
American Airlines, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Macias v. Carnival Corporation
as 1:2024cv21944
Plaintiff:
Nelda Macias
Defendant:
Carnival Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
PERCELL v. REGENCY CENTERS, L.P.
as 1:2024cv21940
Plaintiff:
TABRINA PERCELL
Defendant:
REGENCY CENTERS, L.P.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Cervante v. MACY'S RETAIL HOLDINGS LLC et al
as 1:2024cv21961
Plaintiff:
Deisy Ramirez Cervante
Defendant:
MACY'S RETAIL HOLDINGS LLC, Schindler Elevator Corporation and Joshua Feliciano
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
PERCELL v. REGENCY CENTERS, L.P.
as 1:2024cv21938
Plaintiff:
TABRINA PERCELL
Defendant:
REGENCY CENTERS, L.P.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
