Cases 41 - 49 of 49
Montoya et al v. Clayton, Town of et al
as 1:2008cv00622
Defendant:
Clayton, Town of, Archie J. Romero, III, Andrew Scott and others
Plaintiff:
Angela J Montoya, Michael Montoya and Michael Angelo Montoya
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Digvonni v Faircluogh et al
as 1:2008cv00119
Plaintiff:
Sam Digvonni
Defendant:
Maria T. Fairclough, Rose Bobchak, Jim Lathem and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Castillo v. Marshall et al
as 1:2007cv01298
Plaintiff:
Bernice Castillo
Defendant:
James Marshall, Fred Radosevich and Town of Bernalillo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Luna vs. Lea County Board of Commissioner et al
as 6:2007cv01031
Plaintiff:
Melva Luna and Melva Luna
Defendant:
Jon Martinez, Jamie Moon, Chris Lyle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Luna vs. Lea County Board of Commissioner et al
as 1:2007cv01031
Plaintiff:
Melva Luna and Melva Luna
Defendant:
Jon Martinez, Jamie Moon, Chris Lyle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Luna vs. Lea County Board of Commissioner et al
as 6:2007cv01031
Plaintiff:
Melva Luna and Melva Luna
Defendant:
Jon Martinez, Jamie Moon, Chris Lyle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Luna et al v. Martinez et al
as 6:2007cv00758
Plaintiff:
Melva Luna and Richard Aranda, Jr.
Defendant:
Jon Martinez, Jamie Moon, Chris Lyle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Neelley v. Holmes et al
as 6:2007cv00277
Plaintiff:
Mary Rose Neelley and Mary Rose Neelley
Defendant:
Philip Holmes, Eddie Lucero, Tomas Benavidez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Neelley v. Holmes et al
as 1:2007cv00277
Defendant:
Philip Holmes, Eddie Lucero, Tomas Benavidez and others
Plaintiff:
Carol Neelley, Carol Neelley, Charles E Neelley, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
