Cases 1 - 10 of 1,005
Fantel v. Department Homeland Security et al
as 3:2024cv00594
Plaintiff:
C. John Fantel
Defendant:
Department Homeland Security, State of Rhode Island, Boston Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Fisher v. City of Jacksonville et al
as 3:2024cv00577
Plaintiff:
James Fisher
Defendant:
City of Jacksonville, Jacksonville Sheriffs, J. C. Rose and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
GIVINS v. D&C FOODS INC
as 1:2024cv00089
Plaintiff:
Chiquitarose Givins
Defendant:
D&C Foods, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Fantel v. Handley et al
as 3:2024cv00545
Plaintiff:
C. John Fantel
Defendant:
Jeremy Handley, Stacey O'Neil, Joseph H. Nguyen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Odonoghue v. Fuller
as 2:2024cv00480
Plaintiff:
Wycliffe H. Odonoghue
Defendant:
Judge Joseph C Fuller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (DO NOT USE)
Caplan v. C-Tech Auto Repairs, Inc. et al
as 0:2024cv60893
Plaintiff:
Howard Michael Caplan
Defendant:
C-Tech Auto Repairs, Inc., Troy Iuen and Monique Iuen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv01188
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
TAYLOR v. CITY OF TALLAHASSEE
as 4:2024cv00199
Plaintiff:
RITA C TAYLOR
Defendant:
CITY OF TALLAHASSEE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv21717
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0451 Employment Discrimination
Bigge v. C. W. Roberts Contracting, Incorporated
as 5:2024cv00221
Plaintiff:
William Bigge
Defendant:
C. W. Roberts Contracting, Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
