Cases 91 - 100 of 200
Martin v. Munsey et al
as 2:2017cv01299
Defendant:
B. Bogardus, Deer Ridge Correctional Institution, R. George and others
Plaintiff:
Shawn Michael Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Oien v. Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2017cv00978
Defendant:
Ms. B. Amsberry, Leutenant Boman, Captain Boston and others
Plaintiff:
Ioan Paul Oien
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Douglas v. Kelly
as 6:2017cv00958
Petitioner:
Dameion Douglas
Respondent:
B. Kelly
Unknown:
Lynn David Larsen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Singh v. Gruenwald et al
as 2:2017cv00829
Defendant:
J. Dafoe, C. Dieter, S. Franke and others
Plaintiff:
Rotish Vikash Singh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Waters v. Premo et al
as 6:2017cv00658
Defendant:
B. Laney, Jeff Premo and Lt. Yancey
Plaintiff:
Dennis Aundre Waters
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Norris v. Stancliff et al
as 1:2017cv00589
Defendant:
C. Bolles, S. Brown, E. Bucher and others
Plaintiff:
Richard L. Norris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brower v. Franke et al
as 2:2017cv00367
Defendant:
B. Amsberry, J. Ducheck, S. Franke and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas Fredrick Brower
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Childs v. Amsberry
as 2:2017cv00360
Respondent:
Ms. B Amsberry
Unknown:
Lynn David Larsen, Kristen E. Boyd and Lisa Hay
Petitioner:
Jeremy Eugene Childs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ward v. Vargo et al
as 6:2017cv00327
Defendant:
John Does 1-10, Oregon State Prison Medical Department and Dr. John Vargo
Plaintiff:
Keith B. Ward
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Herlong v. Amsberry
as 2:2017cv00326
Respondent:
Ms. B. Amsberry
Petitioner:
James Wesley Herlong
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
