Cases 131 - 140 of 18,932
FORD v. MORRIS et al
as 1:2024cv00871
Plaintiff:
TODD C. FORD, JR.
Defendant:
JOHN P. MORRIS, DET. I.C.J. PILIGNO, A. LEWIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. CHARLES
as 2:2024cv00956
Plaintiff:
MARK JOHNSON
Defendant:
WARDEN RON CHARLES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RODRIGUEZ VARGAS v. HUDSON COUNTY CORRECTIONAL CENTER et al
as 2:2024cv04449
Plaintiff:
RICARDO RODRIGUEZ VARGAS
Defendant:
HUDSON COUNTY CORRECTIONAL CENTER and T. HALL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PISCIOTTA v. THOMPSON
as 1:2024cv04470
Petitioner:
VINCENT PISCIOTTA
Respondent:
RACHEL THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
PETRONGLO v. WARDEN THOMPSON
as 1:2024cv01474
Petitioner:
THOMAS EDWARD PETRONGLO
Respondent:
WARDEN THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
PIERCE v. AVILES
as 2:2024cv01215
Plaintiff:
MAURICE PIERCE
Defendant:
OSCAR AVILES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCCOY v. USA et al
as 1:2024cv04308
Plaintiff:
TERRY MCCOY
Defendant:
USA, USA BUREAU OF PRISONS, FORT DIX FCI and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
RODRIGUEZ v. THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
as 1:2024cv00621
Petitioner:
JEAN E. RODRIGUEZ
Respondent:
THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
CASTRO-ALMONTE v. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
as 3:2024cv04398
Petitioner:
LUIS CASTRO-ALMONTE
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
PIEDRA ORDONEZ v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2024cv00848
Petitioner:
RICHARD GABRIEL PIEDRA ORDONEZ
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
