Cases 171 - 180 of 1,382
Stansberry v. Enter Alaska Public Defender et al
as 3:2022cv00175
Plaintiff:
Lee Roy J. Stansberry
Defendant:
Enter Alaska Public Defender, Sidery Bill, Fed Public Defe Johns and others
Smith v. Alaska Department of Revenue et al
as 3:2022cv00167
Plaintiff:
Din Ogan Shango Smith
Defendant:
Alaska Department of Revenue, Office of Child Support, Office of Children Services and others
Owens v. State of Alaska
as 2:2022cv00004
Petitioner:
Matt Owens
Respondent:
State of Alaska
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
United States of America v. Nickalaskey
as 3:2022cv00150
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Christopher James Nickalaskey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Stansberry v. Enter Medical Records Depts Medical Advisory Committees et al
as 3:2022cv00146
Plaintiff:
Leroy J. Stansberry
Defendant:
Enter Medical Records Depts Medical Advisory Committees, ACCE Medical Staff, N-3 Hample and others
Bernhardt v. State of Alaska
as 3:2022cv00145
Petitioner:
Clint Lavell Bernhardt
Respondent:
State of Alaska
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
Angellan v. Zorea
as 3:2022cv00134
Plaintiff:
Phillip Michael Angellan
Defendant:
Moshe Zorea
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lomack v. Kwon et al
as 3:2022cv00133
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Lomack
Defendant:
Ryan Kwon, John Woya and Demitrius Kargas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lane v. Gorup et al
as 3:2022cv00132
Plaintiff:
Douglas N Lane
Defendant:
Chelsea Gorup, Viola Hartley and Paula Baker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kone v. Hernandez et al
as 3:2022cv00138
Plaintiff:
Tidiane Kone
Defendant:
Bernice C. Hernandez, Mark Phang, Mike Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
