Cases 21 - 30 of 78
Williams v. Roberts et al
as 2:2021cv00226
Defendant:
Maahs, Doctor Roberts, Whitbread and others
Plaintiff:
Adam Corey Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Albrecht et al v. Oregon Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2021cv00196
Plaintiff:
Daniel Fowler, Toren Pruden, Charles Withrow and others
Defendant:
Sue Washburn, Paula Myers, Ken Jeske and others
Petitioner:
Miles Erb, Leroy Lamont Wells and Serafin Pahua-Pahua
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
King v. Brown et al
as 6:2021cv00164
Plaintiff:
Alexander Adam King
Defendant:
Hendricks, Oregon Dept. of Corrections, Kate Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lyon v. Oregon State Hospital et al
as 6:2020cv01883
Defendant:
Derek Wehr, Patrick Allen, Mike Morris and others
Plaintiff:
Adam Lyon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ha v. Gulick et al
as 2:2020cv01785
Defendant:
Dr. Garth Gulick, Adam Reynolds, John Does 1-20 and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas M. Ha and Thomas Ha
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams-Leal v. Bowser et al
as 2:2020cv01381
Defendant:
Steven Boston, John Doe, Troy Bowser and others
Plaintiff:
James Adams-Leal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Steltz v. Weiner et al
as 2:2020cv00658
Plaintiff:
Adam Troy Steltz
Defendant:
Zack Mazer, John Weiner, Kate Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marshall v. City of Gresham et al
as 3:2020cv00509
Defendant:
Officer Zwick, Officer Wynacott, Officer Reed and others
Plaintiff:
Glen A. Marshall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nightingale v. Kelly et al
as 6:2020cv00406
Defendant:
Craig Prins, John Cataldo, Clayton Borden and others
Plaintiff:
Cameron A. Nightingale
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thorson et al v United States of America
as 3:2019cv01654
Plaintiff:
William Smith, Christopher Turner, Adam Hassell and others
Defendant:
The United States of America and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
