Cases 31 - 40 of 96
Biggins v. Phelps et al
as 1:2019cv01084
Defendant:
C/O Ingram, Area Captains, C/O Holcombe and others
Plaintiff:
James Arthur Biggins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sullins v. Phelps et al
as 1:2019cv00153
Defendant:
Timothy Radcliff, Perry Phelps, Phil Parker and others
Plaintiff:
Jerome Sullins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Staats et al v. Phelps et al
as 1:2019cv00101
Plaintiff:
Abdull Hagg el-quadeer, Obadiah Miller, Dwayne Staats and others
Defendant:
Warden David Pierce, Warden Robert May, Sergeant Cupid and others
Petitioner:
Nina Shahin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adger et al v. Carney et al
as 1:2018cv02048
Plaintiff:
Joseph Crumpler, Antoine Jones, Eugene W. Wiggins and others
Defendant:
Sgt. Ronald Frederick, Lt. Justin Atherholt, Governor John Carney and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Biggins v. Phelps et al
as 1:2018cv01574
Defendant:
Tim Martin, Sergeant Jones, Ken Simpler and others
Plaintiff:
James Arthur Biggins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fatir v. Connections Correctional Healthcare Service, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv01549
Defendant:
Thomas Seacord, Michael S. Jackson, Randall Dotson and others
Plaintiff:
Amir Fatir
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fatir et al v. Phelps et al
as 1:2018cv00933
Plaintiff:
Amir Fatir, Malachai DeBruce, Antonio R. Bailey and others
Defendant:
Perry Phelps, Dana Metzger, Jane Brady and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cephas v. Metzger et al
as 1:2018cv00851
Plaintiff:
Vernon Ernest Dorian Cephas
Defendant:
Dana Metzger, Parker, Scarborough and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parker v. Phelps et al
as 1:2018cv00612
Petitioner:
Michael Parker
Respondent:
Perry Phelps and Dana Metzger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Restrepo v. Phelps et al
as 1:2017cv01044
Plaintiff:
Juan Restrepo
Defendant:
Perry Phelps and Phil Parker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
