Cases 41 - 50 of 39,785
West v. Finks et al
as 1:2024cv01788
Plaintiff:
Ronnie H West
Defendant:
Michael H. Finks and Cobb County Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MURRAY v. COLVIN et al
as 5:2024cv00120
Plaintiff:
ALBERT GORDON MURRAY
Defendant:
JUDGE VERDA COLVIN, SHERIFF DAVID DAVIS, TOMMY WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02593
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 pr Complaint for mandamus relief (prisoner)
AMMONS v. BIBB COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE et al
as 5:2024cv00187
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY AMMONS, IV
Defendant:
BIBB COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE and BIBB COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEYS OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cannon v. Danforth et al
as 5:2024cv00025
Plaintiff:
Juan Antonio Cannon
Defendant:
William Danforth and Paul Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01725
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1693 Electronic Funds Act
Virta v. Wheeler Corrections et al
as 3:2024cv00045
Plaintiff:
Eric Carl Virta
Defendant:
Wheeler Corrections and Shawn Gillis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Franklin v. McNeal et al
as 5:2024cv00043
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Franklin
Defendant:
Officer McNeal, Officer Best, Officer Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vass v. Brawner
as 1:2024cv01661
Petitioner:
Christopher Aaron Vass
Respondent:
Director Ronald Brawner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ASHLEY v. SHEPPARD
as 5:2024cv00119
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN SINCALIR ASHLEY and JUSTIN SINCLAIR ASHLEY
Defendant:
STAN SHEPPARD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
