Cases 41 - 50 of 10,156
Clark v. Miller
as 2:2024cv00645
Petitioner:
Robert Vincent Clark
Respondent:
Jamie Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pierce v. Davenport et al
as 6:2024cv00595
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey A Pierce
Defendant:
Trish Davenport, Steven Weltz, Ahmit Bhatia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. Highberger
as 6:2024cv00492
Petitioner:
Mark James Wilson
Respondent:
Joshua Highberger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Berry v. Wallace et al
as 6:2024cv00499
Plaintiff:
Thomas Leonard Berry
Defendant:
Wallace, Dirkson, Garibay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
King v. Ally et al
as 2:2024cv00583
Plaintiff:
Mr. Dontonio King
Defendant:
Sgt. Ally, Ofc. J. Verity, Ofc. Bourdain and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shabazz v. Oregon Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2024cv00459
Plaintiff:
Sheik King Sheik Sheik Sheikh Shabazz
Defendant:
Oregon Department of Corrections and Oregon State Pen.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. E.O.C.I. et al
as 2:2024cv00623
Plaintiff:
Jermel A. Taylor
Defendant:
E.O.C.I. and Chaplain Zuleta
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. State of Oregon et al
as 2:2024cv00599
Plaintiff:
Jermel Arcilicia Taylor
Defendant:
State of Oregon and Robert D. Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Grant v. Multnomah County Jail
as 3:2024cv00772
Plaintiff:
Raymond LaVaughn Grant
Defendant:
Multnomah County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Berry v. State of Oregon et al
as 6:2024cv00766
Plaintiff:
Thomas Leonard Berry
Defendant:
State of Oregon, Honorable Judge Edmonds and District Attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
