Cases 61 - 70 of 6,823
Mallett v. Soldan et al
as 5:2024cv03131
Defendant:
Tina Miller, Stanley Fruits, Angie Finch and others
Plaintiff:
James Arthur Mallett, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barnett (ID 86695) v. Zmuda et al
as 5:2024cv03092
Defendant:
(fnu) Thomson, Tommy Williams, Dana L. Flores and others
Plaintiff:
Paul Lawrence Barnett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bell v. Warden
as 5:2024cv03129
Petitioner:
Maurice D. Bell
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hamilton v. Soptic
as 5:2024cv03088
Petitioner:
Pierre Quaran Hamilton
Respondent:
Daniel Soptic
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Gibson v. Thaxton et al
as 5:2024cv03100
Defendant:
(fnu) Bartels, (fnu) Nellee, (fnu) Jennings and others
Plaintiff:
David Allen Gibson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Younger et al v. Zmuda et al
as 5:2024cv03091
Plaintiff:
Sharon Huddleston, Kora L. Liles, Kimberley Younger and others
Defendant:
Aramark Food Service, Jeff Zmuda and Donna Hook
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Ward et al
as 5:2024cv03095
Plaintiff:
Michael Ray Scott
Interested Party:
Seward County Sheriff
Defendant:
Angie Davis and Gene Ward
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gully v. Carter
as 5:2024cv03113
Respondent:
C. Carter
Petitioner:
Tvonn Tshawn Gully
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Miller v. Hemken
as 5:2024cv03093
Defendant:
Chianna Hemken
Plaintiff:
DeVonta B. Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bellamy (ID 53454) v. Aramark Corporation et al
as 5:2024cv03102
Defendant:
(fnu) Stevens, Aramark Corporation, T. Williams and others
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Allen Bellamy, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
