Cases 81 - 90 of 10,156
Rocio v. Washington County
as 3:2024cv00363
Petitioner:
Crescencio Garcia Rocio
Respondent:
Washington County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rankin v. Google
as 6:2024cv00474
Plaintiff:
Lawson Reed Rankin
Defendant:
Google
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pedrotti v. Jacquez
as 3:2024cv00394
Petitioner:
Dennis Pedrotti
Respondent:
Israel Jacquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Raudel v. Jacquez
as 3:2024cv00391
Petitioner:
Ulysses Ruiz Raudel
Respondent:
Israel Jacquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Guerrero Valenzuela v. Jacquez
as 3:2024cv00382
Petitioner:
Marcos Alfonso Guerrero Valenzuela
Respondent:
Israel Jacquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Stratton v. Miller
as 2:2024cv00667
Petitioner:
Jaime Michelle Stratton and Jared Michael Clark
Respondent:
Jamie Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Taylor v. Oregon Department of Corrections
as 2:2024cv00460
Plaintiff:
Jermel Arcilicia Taylor doing business as New Muslim Party, Corp
Defendant:
Oregon Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv00453
Plaintiff:
Jermel Arcilicia Taylor
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lemons v. Anglea et al
as 3:2024cv00340
Plaintiff:
Daniel Ray Lemons
Defendant:
C. Anglea, Mr. Brooks and FCI Sheridan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Lopez v. Reyes et al
as 2:2024cv00374
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Constantino Lopez
Defendant:
Erin Reyes, T. Hudson, Patrick Maney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
