Cases 1 - 10 of 412
Cardenas v. Oregon Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2024cv01007
Plaintiff:
Demecio Cardenas
Defendant:
Oregon Department of Corrections, Warren Roberts, Dr. Leland Beamer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniel v. Heredia
as 6:2024cv00855
Plaintiff:
Dusty Jo Daniel
Defendant:
Deputy Heredia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Goering-Runyan v. USA
as 3:2024cv00735
Petitioner:
Daniel Lynn Goering-Runyan
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Davis v. Davies et al
as 2:2024cv00449
Plaintiff:
Daniel Wayne Davis
Defendant:
Mrs. Davies and David Pedro
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lemons v. Anglea et al
as 3:2024cv00340
Plaintiff:
Daniel Ray Lemons
Defendant:
C. Anglea, Mr. Brooks and FCI Sheridan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Harper v. Taylor, et al
as 2:2024cv00302
Plaintiff:
Daniel Zachary Harper
Defendant:
Michael Taylor, Jr., J. Carey, J. Frazier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harper v. Roberts et al
as 2:2024cv00303
Plaintiff:
Daniel Zachary Harper
Defendant:
Dr. Warren Roberts, N.P.M. Davies, Joe Bugher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Borton v. Matteucci et al
as 6:2024cv00204
Plaintiff:
Michael Borton
Defendant:
Delores Matteucci, Oregon Health Authority, Oregon State Hospital and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dickson v. Jacquez
as 3:2024cv00142
Petitioner:
Joseph Daniel Dickson
Respondent:
Israel Jacquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Barragan v. Jacquez
as 3:2024cv00112
Petitioner:
Dionicio Daniel Barragan
Respondent:
israel jaqcuez and Israel Jacquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
