Cases 1 - 10 of 4,273
(PC) Wilson v. Morales et al
as 1:2024cv01113
Defendant:
Bryan D. Phillips, California Substance Abuse Treatment Facility, M. Jones and others
Plaintiff:
David W. Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv08007
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv07929
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv07932
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv07958
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv06492
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Sarukhanyan v. Berry et al
as 1:2024cv01091
Defendant:
Anu Banerjee, Robert Scharffenberg, S. Gates and others
Plaintiff:
Aram Sarukhanyan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perryman v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 3:2024cv01633
Defendant:
James Hill, John Doe 2, Jeff McComber and others
Plaintiff:
David Perryman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Duran v. The People of the State of California
as 3:2024cv01625
Respondent:
The People of the State of California
Petitioner:
David B. Duran
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Gray v. Alvarez et al
as 2:2024at01123
Defendant:
Martinez, S. McCambridge, M. Muslim and others
Plaintiff:
David Gray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
