Cases 1 - 10 of 134
BADU v. CHARLES
as 2:2024cv03931
Plaintiff:
GREGORY BADU
Defendant:
WARDEN RON CHARLES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BADU v. LAW OFFICE OF MONTELL FIGGINS et al
as 2:2024cv02418
Plaintiff:
GREGORY BADU
Defendant:
LAW OFFICE OF MONTELL FIGGINS, DOUGLASS MITCHELL and ASHLEE CHAVES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BADU v. ESSEX COUNTY et al
as 2:2024cv01619
Plaintiff:
GREGORY BADU
Defendant:
ESSEX COUNTY and ESSEX COUNTY DEPT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. SCOTT et al
as 2:2024cv00445
Plaintiff:
DANIEL L. JOHNSON
Defendant:
EARL SCOTT, GREGORY WILLIAMS and ZAIRE PALMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DONZUSO v. KELLY et al
as 1:2023cv21695
Plaintiff:
GREGORY DONZUSO
Defendant:
WARDEN MICHAEL KELLY, ATLANTIC COUNTY JUSTICE FACILITY, CORRECTIONS OFFICER SMALL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act
FISHER v. COUNTY OF MERCER et al
as 3:2023cv20947
Plaintiff:
GREGORY L. FISHER
Defendant:
COUNTY OF MERCER, CHARLES ELLIS and JOHN/JANE DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act
GITTENS v. PEPPER et al
as 1:2023cv17721
Plaintiff:
DARIUS HEIMER GITTENS
Defendant:
RYAN PEPPER, RAIMON NG, JONATHAN P. GRAMP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GREGORY v. NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE BOARD et al
as 2:2023cv03778
Petitioner:
COLEMAN GREGORY
Respondent:
NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE BOARD, DINA I. ROGERS, KENNETH WARD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
RAWLS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2023cv00431
Plaintiff:
GREGORY M. RAWLS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
DEPACK v. CAPONEGRO
as 2:2022cv07596
Plaintiff:
ROY DEPACK
Defendant:
GREGORY CAPONEGRO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
