Cases 1 - 10 of 499
Green v. Weston
as 6:2024cv01601
Plaintiff:
Gary Devon Green
Defendant:
Judge Kathryn Weston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clair v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Duval)
as 3:2024cv00829
Petitioner:
Gary Leonard Clair
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00313
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Evans v. Leblanc, et al
as 3:2024cv00440
Plaintiff:
Paris Demetrius Evans
Defendant:
Bob LeBlanc, Gary E Molek, Heather Danielle Pastoor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Terrell v. Gaston et al
as 2:2024cv00393
Plaintiff:
Chantea Tamika Terrell
Defendant:
Sergeant Gaston and Gary
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
EVANS v. LEBLANC et al
as 4:2024cv00160
Plaintiff:
PARIS DEMETRIUS EVANS
Defendant:
BOB LEBLANC, GARY E MOLEK, HEATHER DANIELLE PASTOOR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SIMMONS v. DIXON et al
as 4:2024cv00114
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW TYRONE SIMMONS
Defendant:
RICKY D DIXON, GARY HEWETT and D BURCH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WRIGHT v. MCHENRY et al
as 4:2024cv00006
Plaintiff:
ROBERT LEE WRIGHT, ROBERT LEE WRIGHT, III and ROBERT L WRIGHT
Defendant:
S C MCHENRY, MR LAROCHELLE, STERLING HICKERSON JR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BOWMAN v. DIXON et al
as 4:2023cv00528
Plaintiff:
DUSTY L BOWMAN
Defendant:
RICKY D DIXON, MR RICHARD COMERFORD, GARY HEWETT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
YESBICK v. ENGLISH
as 0:2023cv62309
Plaintiff:
Tommy Yesbick
Defendant:
GARY ENGLISH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
