Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Sawyer et al v. Deschutes County et al
as 6:2024cv00267
Plaintiff:
Kent Sawyer and Sandra Lynn Short
Defendant:
Deschutes County, L. Shane Nelson, Michael Schults and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wells v. Kruse et al
as 6:2018cv01919
Plaintiff:
Leroy Lamont Wells
Defendant:
David Saydack, Daniel R. Kruse and Neil F. Byl
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wells v. Rosenblum et al
as 6:2017cv01370
Defendant:
Vicki Applegate, Neil F. Byl, Anna Marie Joyce and others
Plaintiff:
Leroy Lamont Wells
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Santana v. Clark
as 3:2016cv02122
Defendant:
A. Neil Clark
Plaintiff:
Eduardo Valdez Santana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv02121
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Wells v. Rosenblum et al
as 2:2016cv01403
Defendant:
Robyn M. Anderson, Vicki Applegate, Kelly Ashton and others
Plaintiff:
Leroy Lamont Wells
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Flowers v. USA
as 3:2016cv01229
Petitioner:
James Neil Flowers
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Wells v. Nass et al
as 2:2016cv00582
Defendant:
Roybn M. Anderson, Vicki Applegate, Kelly Ashton and others
Plaintiff:
Leroy Lamont Wells
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wells v. Byl et al
as 2:2016cv00422
Defendant:
Neil F. Byl, Megan Door, Alex Gardner and others
Plaintiff:
Leroy Lamont Wells
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wells v. Kruse et al
as 2:2016cv00423
Defendant:
Neil F. Byl, Michael Casey, C. Criswell and others
Plaintiff:
Leroy Lamont Wells
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
