Cases 1 - 10 of 2,221
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv06649
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 1156 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv06655
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 1156 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv06659
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 1156 Administrative Procedure Act
Jaime v. Martuscello et al
as 9:2024cv01114
Defendant:
Daniel F. Martuscello, III, C. Witty-Lewis, John Doe #1 and others
Plaintiff:
Luis Jaime
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv06459
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 1156 Administrative Procedure Act
Moore v. Maye et al
as 9:2024cv01105
Defendant:
J. Makee, Richard J. Damico, C. Liberty and others
Plaintiff:
Horace Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wells v. James
as 1:2024cv06979
Respondent:
Letitia A. James, Esq.
Petitioner:
Carl D. Wells
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Grijalva v. Coward et al
as 2:2024cv06365
Defendant:
Office of Temporary and Disability Assistance (OTDA), Kathryn L. Coward and Suffolk County Family Court IV-D Agency
Plaintiff:
Jaime-Arturo: Grijalva
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv05851
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv05654
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
