Cases 31 - 40 of 102
Perez v. Virginia Marble and Granite, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv00366
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Perez
Defendant:
Virginia Marble and Granite, Inc. , Mehmet Munir Akay and Tolga Yenigun
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Ewers et al v. City of Petersburg, Virginia
as 3:2016cv00029
Plaintiff:
Thomas Ewers , James Aponte , William Bergamini and others
Defendant:
City of Petersburg, Virginia
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Fallen et al v. ADI Worldlink, LLC
as 1:2015cv01500
Plaintiff:
Kevin Fallen and Thomas H. Banks
Defendant:
ADI Worldlink, LLC and The Goal, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Perez v. Fairfax Marble and Granite, LLC et al
as 1:2015cv01450
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Perez
Defendant:
Fairfax Marble and Granite, LLC, Mehmet Topcu and Enes Celik
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938
Perez v. BKN9, LLC et al
as 1:2015cv01379
Plaintiff:
Thomas Perez
Defendant:
BKN9, LLC and Manjeet Singh
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938
Perez v. S&H Restaurant, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv01259
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Perez
Defendant:
S&H Restaurant, Inc., Mandal Enterprises L.C, Tejal Restaurant, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Thomas v. Virginia Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Company
as 3:2015cv00499
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Thomas
Defendant:
Virginia Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Cephas et al v. City of Richmond, Virginia
as 3:2015cv00332
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Cephas , Jamie Albert , Solange Cole and others
Defendant:
City of Richmond, Virginia
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Schultz et al v. MGA Research Corporation
as 1:2015cv00594
Plaintiff:
Jelena Schultz and Thomas Miller
Defendant:
MGA Research Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Perez v. Lewis et al
as 1:2015cv00474
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Perez
Defendant:
Robert W. Lewis, Kristie L. McDonald, Enterworks, Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
