Cases 71 - 80 of 214
Neff et al v. Flowers Foods, Inc. et al
as 5:2015cv00254
Plaintiff:
Nick Neff and Matthew McCrea
Defendant:
Flowers Foods, Inc., LePage Bakeries, Inc. and CK Sales Co., LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Coniff et al v. State of Vermont et al
as 2:2010cv00032
Plaintiff:
Neil W. Aguiar, Kathy M. Blanchard, Thomas R. Burke and others
Defendant:
Jeb Spaulding, Neale Lunderville, State of Vermont and others
Not Classified By Court:
ENE Evaluator
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Galuszka v. Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company
as 2:2015cv00241
Plaintiff:
David Galuszka
Defendant:
Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Mayhew v. Hermitage Club, LLC
as 2:2015cv00147
Plaintiff:
Effie Mayhew
Defendant:
Hermitage Club, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Parent v. UNUM Life Insurance Company of America
as 2:2015cv00145
Plaintiff:
Glendeen Parent
Defendant:
UNUM Life Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Terino v. The Woodstock Resort Corp. et al
as 2:2015cv00143
Plaintiff:
Mar-Rae X. Terino
Defendant:
Woodstock Resort Corp., The and WTS International Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Potter v. United of Omaha Life Insurance Co.
as 2:2015cv00053
Plaintiff:
Connie Potter
Defendant:
United of Omaha Life Insurance Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Pumo v. Albany College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences
as 2:2015cv00033
Plaintiff:
Dorothy Pumo
Defendant:
Albany College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
Spiegel v. CIGNA Group Life Insurance
as 2:2015cv00014
Plaintiff:
Cody Spiegel
Defendant:
CIGNA Group Life Insurance
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Lloyd v. UNUM Life Insurance Company of America
as 1:2014cv00258
Plaintiff:
Karen Lloyd
Defendant:
UNUM Life Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
