Cases 1 - 6 of 6
ATLANTIC SHORE SURGICAL ASSOCIATES v. UNITEDHEALTHCARE et al
as 3:2022cv05420
Plaintiff:
ATLANTIC SHORE SURGICAL ASSOCIATES
Defendant:
UNITEDHEALTHCARE, UNITED HEALTHCARE SERVICES LLC, THE PORT AUTHORITY OF NEW YORK AND NEW JERSEY and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
THE TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY et al v. THE PORT AUTHORITY OF NEW YORK AND NEW JERSEY et al
as 2:2016cv08496
Plaintiff:
THE TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY and THE TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY OF AMERICA
Defendant:
THE PORT AUTHORITY OF NEW YORK AND NEW JERSEY, MAURO PRADO and SENILDA PRADO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey et al v. Everest National Insurance Co.
as 1:2013cv05468
Plaintiff:
The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey and Bovis Lend Lease LMB, Inc
Defendant:
Everest National Insurance Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Port Authority of New York and v. Tully
as 13-2399
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Port Authority of New York and New Jersey
Plaintiff-Cross-Defendant - Appellee:
Illinois National Insurance Company and Tully Construction Company, Inc.
Defendant-Counter-Claimant - Appellee:
Covenant Aviation Security, LLC
Defendant - Appellee:
Zurich American Insurance Company
Port Authority of New York and New Jersey v. Tully Construction Company, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv01092
Defendant:
Covenant Aviation Security, LLC, Illinois National Insurance Company, Tully Construction Company, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Port Authority of New York and New Jersey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Insurance Contract
PORT AUTHORITY OF NEW YORK AND NEW JERSEY et al v. LIBERTY SURPLUS INSURANCE CORPORATION
as 2:2011cv00580
Plaintiff:
PORT AUTHORITY OF NEW YORK AND NEW JERSEY and PORT AUTHORITY TRANS HUDSON CORPORATION
Defendant:
LIBERTY SURPLUS INSURANCE CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
