Marine Cases filed in New York
Cases 21 - 30 of 147
Backer EHP Inc. et al v. M/V One Apus et al
as 1:2022cv06461
Plaintiff: Backer EHP Inc. and HDI Global Insurance Company
Defendant: M/V ONE Apus, Ocean Network Express Pte. Ltd., Hapag-Lloyd Aktiengesellschaft and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 1701 Violation of Shipping Act of 1984 (DISCONTINUED AFTER 1/27/2014)
Travelers Property Casualty Company of America v. American Commercial Transport, Inc et al
as 1:2022cv06386
Plaintiff: Travelers Property Casualty Company of America
3Rd Party Plaintiff: American Commercial Transport, Inc., UPS Asia Group Pte Ltd. and Pronto Great China Corp
Defendant: Rohlig USA LLC, Topocean Consolidation Service (Los Angeles) Inc., Translink Shipping Inc. and others
Cross Defendant: Hyundai Merchant Marine CO Ltd
3Rd Party Defendant: Ocean Network Express Pte. Ltd., Shine Shipping Ltd, Shine International Transportation (Hong Kong) Ltd and others
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 81 Damaged Goods While Being Transported (DISCONTINUED AFTER 1/27/2014)
LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY v. AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL CARGO SERVICE, INC.
as 1:2022cv06384
Plaintiff: Liberty Mutual Insurance Company
Defendant: American International Cargo Service Inc.
3Rd Party Defendant: M/V ONE Apus, CHIDORI SHIP HOLDING LLC, JESSICA SHIP HOLDINGS S.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 741 Shipping (DISCONTINUED AFTER 1/27/2014)
Certain Underwriters at Lloyds of London Subscribing to Policy No. 600230 v. Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv05398
Plaintiff: Certain Underwriters at Lloyds of London Subscribing to Policy No. 600230
Defendant: Expeditors International of Washington Inc., Expeditors International Ocean and Doe
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 81 Damaged Goods While Being Transported (DISCONTINUED AFTER 1/27/2014)
PEAG LLC et al v. Flexport International LLC
as 1:2022cv05401
Plaintiff: PEAG LLC and Certain Underwriters At Lloyd's Of London
Defendant: Flexport International LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 ad Admiralty
AIT WORLDWIDE LOGISTICS, INC. et al v. M/V ONE APUS in rem et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv05220
Defendant: HMM Co Ltd., M/V One Apus in rem, OCEAN NETWORK EXPRESS PTE LTD and others
Plaintiff: Ait Worldwide Logistics Inc., Topocean Consolidation Service (Los Angeles) Inc. and Worldbridge Logistics, Inc.
C.H. ROBINSON INTERNATIONAL INC. v. M/V ONE APUS et al
as 1:2022cv05221
Plaintiff: C.H. Robinson International Inc. doing business as Christal Lines
Defendant: M/V ONE Apus, CHIDORI SHIP HOLDING LLC, JESSICA SHIP HOLDINGS S.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 81 Damaged Goods While Being Transported (DISCONTINUED AFTER 1/27/2014)
Atlantic Specialty Insurance Company et al v. Apex Logistics International Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv05277
Plaintiff: Atlantic Specialty Insurance Company, Federal Insurance Company, Indemnity Insurance Company of North America and others
Defendant: Apex Logistics International Inc., UPS Asia Group Pte. Ltd., Topocean Consolidation Service (Los Angeles) Inc. and others
3Rd Party Defendant: Yang Ming Marine Transport Corporation, Yang Ming (America) Corporation, Ocean Network Express Pte., Ltd. ONE and others
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 81 Damaged Goods While Being Transported (DISCONTINUED AFTER 1/27/2014)
The Hartford Syndicate 1221, Lloyds of London v. COSCO Shipping Lines Co., Ltd.
as 1:2022cv03639
Plaintiff: The Hartford Syndicate 1221, Lloyds of London
Defendant: COSCO Shipping Lines Co., Ltd.
3Rd Party Defendant: BNSF Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 mc Marine Contract
The Hartford Syndicate 1221, Lloyds of London v. Orient Overseas Container Line Limited We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv03596
Plaintiff: The Hartford Syndicate 1221, Lloyds of London
Defendant: Orient Overseas Container Line Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 mc Marine Contract

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?