Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Travelers Property Casualty Company of America et al vs. Kongsberg Maritime, Inc.
as 1:2024cv03599
Plaintiff:
Travelers Property Casualty Company of America, Zurich American Insurance Company and Seastreak, LLC
Defendant:
Kongsberg Maritime, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Travelers Property Casualty Company of America v. Shipco Transport Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv04074
Plaintiff:
Travelers Property Casualty Company of America
Defendant:
Shipco Transport Inc. and Atlantic Container Line AB
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 ad Admiralty
Travelers Property Casualty Company of America et al v. MSC Mediterranean Shipping Company S.A.
as 1:2023cv03971
Plaintiff:
Travelers Property Casualty Company of America, National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA and Trader Joe's Company
Defendant:
MSC Mediterranean Shipping Company S.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 ad Admiralty
Travelers Property Casualty Company of America v. Expeditors International of Washington Inc
as 1:2023cv00568
Plaintiff:
Travelers Property Casualty Company of America
Defendant:
Expeditors International of Washington Inc.
Consolidated Defendant:
CMA CGM, S.A.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 741 Shipping (DISCONTINUED AFTER 1/27/2014)
Travelers Property Casualty Company of America v. Cloud Ocean Line Limited et al
as 1:2023cv00331
Plaintiff:
Travelers Property Casualty Company of America
Defendant:
Cloud Ocean Line Limited, Airport Clearance Service, Inc. and DRT International Logistics Inc.
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Ocean Network Express, PTE, LTD.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 ad Admiralty
Travelers Property Casualty Company of America v. Cohesion Freight (HK) Limited et al
as 1:2023cv00334
Plaintiff:
Travelers Property Casualty Company of America
Cross Claimant:
Cohesion Freight (HK) Limited
Cross Defendant:
Yang Ming Marine Transport Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 ad Admiralty
Travelers Property Casualty Company of America v. Expeditors International of Washington Inc
as 1:2022cv08572
Plaintiff:
Travelers Property Casualty Company of America
Defendant:
Expeditors International of Washington Inc.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 1300 F.E.L.A. (DISCONTINUED AFTER 1/27/2014)
Travelers Property Casualty Company of America v. Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv07943
Plaintiff:
Travelers Property Casualty Company of America
Defendant:
Expeditors International of Washington, Inc., AIT Worldwide Logistics, Inc. and C.H. Robinson International, Inc.
4Th Party Defendant:
M/V One Apus, in rem, CHIDORI SHIP HOLDING LLC, JESSICA SHIP HOLDING S.A. and others
3Rd Party Defendant:
Ocean Network Express Pte. Ltd. and Hapag Lloyd Aktiengesellchaft, Hamburg
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
Yang Ming Marine Transport Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Travelers Property Casualty Company of America v. American Commercial Transport, Inc et al
as 1:2022cv06386
Plaintiff:
Travelers Property Casualty Company of America
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
American Commercial Transport, Inc., UPS Asia Group Pte Ltd. and Pronto Great China Corp
Defendant:
Rohlig USA LLC, Topocean Consolidation Service (Los Angeles) Inc., Translink Shipping Inc. and others
Cross Defendant:
Hyundai Merchant Marine CO Ltd
3Rd Party Defendant:
Ocean Network Express Pte. Ltd., Shine Shipping Ltd, Shine International Transportation (Hong Kong) Ltd and others
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 81 Damaged Goods While Being Transported (DISCONTINUED AFTER 1/27/2014)
TRAVELERS PROPERTY CASUALTY COMPANY OF AMERICA v. DYNAMIC WORLDWIDE LOGISTICS, INC.
as 1:2022cv06370
Plaintiff:
Travelers Property Casualty Company of America and H&T SEAFOOD, INC.
Defendant:
Dynamic Worldwide Logistics, Inc.
3Rd Party Defendant:
M/V ONE Apus, CHIDORI SHIP HOLDING LLC, JESSICA SHIP HOLDINGS S.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 741 Shipping (DISCONTINUED AFTER 1/27/2014)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
