Cases 1 - 6 of 6
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. LJC DEFENSE CONTRACTING INC et al
as 3:2011cv00405
Defendant:
LJC DEFENSE CONTRACTING INC and LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1352
General Supply & Services, Inc. v. Facility Defense Consultants, Inc. et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 1:2011cv01300
Plaintiff:
General Supply & Services, Inc.
Defendant:
Facility Defense Consultants, Inc. , SAFECO Insurance Company of America, Nicholas Oltmans and others
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3131
Thomas Floors, Inc v. US Builders Company et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 2:2010cv02045
Defendant:
Nellis Airforce Space, U.S. Department of Defense, US Builders Company and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas Floors, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1352 Miller Act
Lyon Workspace Products, L.L.C. v. Defense Associates, Inc. et al
as 4:2009cv00134
Plaintiff:
Lyon Workspace Products, L.L.C.
Defendant:
Defense Associates, Inc. and . Unknown Surety
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
Lyon Workspace Products, L.L.C. v. Defense Associates, Inc.
as 4:2009cv00133
Plaintiff:
Lyon Workspace Products, L.L.C.
Defendant:
Defense Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. LJC DEFENSE CONTRACTING INC et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 3:2008cv00569
Plaintiff:
IN THE NAME OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FOR THE USE AND BENEFIT OF TALON INDUSTRIES, INC.
Defendant:
LJC DEFENSE CONTRACTING INC, MORRIS-CLARK CONTRACTING, LLC and LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.