Miller Act Cases
Porges Electrical Group, Inc. v. Travelers Casualty and Surety, et al
as 21-16416
Plaintiff / Appellee: PORGES ELECTRICAL GROUP, INC., United States of America for the use and benefit of
Defendant / Appellant: TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY OF AMERICA and PATRICIA I. ROMERO, INC., DBA Pacific West Builders
Type: Contract Miller Act
United States of America for the use of the Camacho Family Partnership dba "Dirt Doktor" v. Travelers Casualty & Surety Company of America et al
as 1:2015cv00013
Plaintiff: United States of America for the Use of the Camacho Family Partnership
Defendant: Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America and Patricia I. Romero, Inc.
Counter_claimant: Patricia I. Romero, Inc. and Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America
Counter_defendant: United States of America for the Use of the Camacho Family Partnership
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270
Type: Contract Miller Act
Frontier Mechanical, Inc. v. Patricia I. Romero, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv00989
Plaintiff: Frontier Mechanical, Inc.
Defendant: Patricia (I) I. Romero, Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America and Patricia I. Romero, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3131
Type: Contract Miller Act
United States of America, for the use and benefit of Alcorn Fence Company v. Romero General Construction Corp. et al
as 3:2014cv00577
Plaintiff: United States of America, for the use and benefit of Alcorn Fence Company
Defendant: Romero General Construction Corp. and Hudson Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270
Type: Contract Miller Act
Chaparral Materials, Inc. v. HDR Enterprises, LLC et al
as 1:2010cv00550
Plaintiff: Chaparral Materials, Inc.
Defendant: HDR Enterprises, LLC, Christopher C. Hernandez, Shawn Schmidt and others
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270
Type: Contract Miller Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?