Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Two Rivers Site Development, Inc. v. John C. Grimberg Company, Inc. et al
as 8:2015cv03400
Plaintiff:
Two Rivers Site Development, Inc.
Defendant:
John C. Grimberg Company, Inc. and Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3131
United States of America for the use and benefit of Finishes, Inc. et al v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company et al
as 1:2014cv01629
Plaintiff:
United States of America for the use and benefit of Finishes, Inc. and Finishes, Inc.
Defendant:
Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company, . and James W. Ancel, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1352
United States of America for the use of Birckhead Electric, Inc. v. James W. Ancel, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv02498
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
James W. Ancel, Inc. and Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3131
Concor Networks, Inc. v. Amatea/Grimberg Joint Venture et al
as 1:2013cv00753
Plaintiff:
Concor Networks, Inc.
Defendant:
Amatea/Grimberg Joint Venture, Amatea, LLC, John C. Grimberg Co., Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3131 Miller Act
Fingles Metalworks, Inc. et al v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company
as 1:2012cv02730
Plaintiff:
Fingles Metalworks, Inc. and United States of America
Defendant:
Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3131
IES Commercial, Inc. v. The Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company
as 1:2012cv02198
Plaintiff:
IES Commercial, Inc.
Defendant:
The Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3131
For the Use and Benefit of American Builders & Contractors Supply Co., Inc. v. John C. Grimberg Company, Inc. et al
as 8:2010cv02610
Plaintiff:
For the Use and Benefit of American Builders & Contractors Supply Co., Inc.
Defendant:
John C. Grimberg Company, Inc. and Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3131
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
