Cases 1 - 10 of 137
ROIC Washington LLC v. Kelly et al
as 2:2024cv00731
Plaintiff:
ROIC Washington LLC
Defendant:
Kevin Kelly, Witta Payackapan, Maritza Payackapan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Ju v. Ju
as 2:2024cv00183
Plaintiff:
Frances Du Ju
Defendant:
Chwen Jye Ju
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00225
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Port of Vancouver USA v. BNSF Railway Company
as 3:2023cv05560
Plaintiff:
Port of Vancouver USA
Defendant:
BNSF Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Marcos-Chavela v. Multnomah County Circuit Court of the State of Oregon
as 2:2022cv00854
Plaintiff:
Susan Marcos-Chavela
Defendant:
Multnomah County Circuit Court of the State of Oregon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Macaluso v. Bakken et al
as 3:2022cv05169
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Macaluso
Defendant:
Jill Andrea Bakken, Direct Procurement Inc and STG Contractors LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Pierce Group Master Endowment Care Fund et al v. Kastle Enterprises LLC et al
as 3:2022cv05130
Plaintiff:
The Pierce Group Inc., Pierce Group Master Endowment Care Fund and Pierce Group Inc
Defendant:
INDIVIDUAL MICHAEL KUEHNER, Kastle Enterprises LLC, Olympic Trust and others
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 1441 Contract Real Estate
General Casualty Company of Wisconsin v. United Parcel Service Inc
as 1:2020cv03158
Plaintiff:
General Casualty Company of Wisconsin
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc. and United Parcel Service Inc
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 81
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 2:2020cv01415
Defendant:
Caleb Carr, Vita Inclinata Technologies Inc and Derek Martin
Plaintiff:
James Watkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.