Cases 101 - 110 of 163
Life Care Centers of Haltom v. Thompson et al
as 4:2010cv00537
Plaintiff:
Life Care Centers of Haltom
Defendant:
Helen Thompson and Buford Akers
Counter_claimant:
Helen Thompson and Buford Akers
Counter_defendant:
Life Care Centers of Haltom
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Chandler
as 1:2010cv00569
Plaintiff:
Anna B. Chandler
Defendant:
Specialty Risk Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2345 Medicare Recovery
Fannette v. College Station Hospital L P
as 4:2010cv02700
Defendant:
College Station Hospital L P
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Fannette
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
PARTY X v. PARTY Y
as 4:2010cv02277
Plaintiff:
PARTY X
Defendant:
PARTY Y
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Silver-Hawk Healthcare Systems Inc v. United States Department of Health and Human Services
as 4:2010cv01999
Plaintiff:
Silver-Hawk Healthcare Systems Inc and Vitalis Onu
Defendant:
United States Department of Health and Human Services and Palmetto GBA LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Heart to Heart Hospice of Tyler, Ltd. v. Sebelius
as 4:2010cv00275
Plaintiff:
Heart to Heart Hospice of Tyler, Ltd.
Defendant:
Kathleen Sebelius
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
Harris Hospice, Inc. v. Sebelius
as 4:2010cv00252
Plaintiff:
Harris Hospice, Inc.
Defendant:
Kathleen Sebelius
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
Springs v. Healthcare Services Corporation Illinois
as 3:2010cv00802
Plaintiff:
Adriane Springs
Defendant:
Healthcare Services Corporation Illinois
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
Kingsland Hospital, LP et al v. Sebelius
as 4:2010cv01055
Defendant:
Kathleen Sebelius
Plaintiff:
Kingsland Hospital, LP and St. Michael's Hospital & Healthcare Group, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Anselmo v. Sebelius
as 1:2009cv00995
Plaintiff:
Charles Anselmo
Defendant:
Kathleen Sebelius
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1320 a Recovery of civil monetary penalty & assessment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
