Cases 11 - 20 of 66
Brad Warrington v. Rocky Patel Premium Cigars, Inc., et al
as 22-12575
Plaintiff / Appellee:
BRAD WARRINGTON
Defendant / Appellant:
ROCKY PATEL PREMIUM CIGARS, INC. and RAKESH PATEL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv04134
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Stockholders Suits
Thomascik v. Phillips et al
as 1:2022cv03923
Plaintiff:
Brad Thomascik
Defendant:
Keith D. Phillips, Bruce Czachor, Gregory Swan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Janklow et al v. Musk et al
as 1:2022cv00611
Plaintiff:
Alvin Janklow
Defendant:
Elon Musk, Robyn Denholm, Kimbal Musk and others
Nominal Defendant:
Tesla, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
In Re: Tesla Inc. Stockholder Derivative Litigation
as 1:2022cv00592
Plaintiff:
Solomon Chau
Defendant:
Elon Musk, Robyn Denholm, Kimbal Musk and others
Nominal Defendant:
TESLA, INC.
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Alvin Janklow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Warrington v. Patel et al
as 2:2022cv00076
Plaintiff:
Brad Warrington
Defendant:
Rakesh Patel and Rocky Patel Premium Cigars, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Warrington v. Patel et al
as 2:2022cv00077
Plaintiff:
Brad Warrington
Defendant:
Rakesh Patel and Rocky Patel Premium Cigars, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Stockholders Suits
Hines v. Palikaras et al
as 1:2022cv00248
Plaintiff:
Brad Hines
Defendant:
George Palikaras, Kenneth Rice, Greg McCabe and others
Ho Han v. Fusaro et al
as 1:2021cv06509
Plaintiff:
Kyu Ho Han
Defendant:
Jim Fusaro, Nipul Patel, Troy Alstead and others
Nominal Defendant:
Array Technologies, Inc.
Kwan v. Fusaro et al
as 1:2021cv06127
Plaintiff:
Wa Ping Kwan
Defendant:
Jim Fusaro, Nipul Patel, Troy Alstead and others
Nominal Defendant:
Array Technologies, Inc.
Interested Party:
Kyu Ho Han
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
