Cases 41 - 50 of 60
KBZ COMMUNICATIONS, INC. v. CBE TECHNOLOGIES, LLC et al
as 2:2013cv02011
Plaintiff:
KBZ COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
Defendant:
CBE TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, JOHN MANN, BRENDA BARROWCLOUGH and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
KAYMARK v. UDREN LAW OFFICES, P.C.
as 2:2013cv00419
Plaintiff:
DALE KAYMARK
Defendant:
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. and UDREN LAW OFFICES, P.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract
LIM v. RAJAN et al
as 2:2013cv01385
Plaintiff:
DAVID BOHYEON LIM
Defendant:
MATHU RAJAN, YOUNG K. PARK, LAW OFFICES OF YOUNG K. PARK and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Heurlin et al v. Yankowski et al
as 3:2011cv00770
Plaintiff:
Ronald R. Heurlin and Tanya E. Heurlin
Defendant:
Steven Yankowski , Thornhurst Properties, LLC , Premier Equity Management Services, Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
BUTLER TRANSIT AUTHORITY v. OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT
as 2:2011cv00217
Plaintiff:
BUTLER TRANSIT AUTHORITY
Defendant:
OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
HAYHURST v. EXTENDICARE, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv00185
Plaintiff:
ANDREA HAYHURST
Defendant:
EXTENDICARE, INC. and LAW OFFICE OF BRIAN SCOTT DIETRICH, P.C.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Wolfe et al v. Office of Personnel Management
as 4:2010cv02546
Plaintiff:
James Wolfe and Brenna Cameron Wolfe
Defendant:
Office of Personnel Management
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
LAW OFFICE OF MARVIN LUNDY et al v. WHITEHAVEN S.F., LLC
as 2:2010cv04544
Plaintiff:
LAW OFFICE OF MARVIN LUNDY and STEVEN L. CHUNG
Defendant:
WHITEHAVEN S.F., LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
IKON OFFICE SOLUTIONS, INC. v. TOOMSEN
as 2:2009cv00611
Plaintiff:
IKON OFFICE SOLUTIONS, INC.
Defendant:
LEE TOOMSEN
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv00273
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
