Cases 71 - 80 of 179
Turner et al v. Apple, Inc
as 5:2018cv03048
Defendant:
Apple, Inc
Plaintiff:
Remy Turner , Christopher Martin and Joey Baruch
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301
Lemp v. Seterus, Inc.
as 2:2018cv01313
Plaintiff:
Martin Lemp
Defendant:
Seterus, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
In Re: MacBook Keyboard Litigation
as 5:2018cv02813
Plaintiff:
Zixuan Rao, Kyle Barbaro, Christopher Martin and others
Defendant:
Apple Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Dulberg v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
as 4:2018cv01611
Plaintiff:
Martin Dulberg
Defendant:
Uber Technologies, Inc. and Rasier, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gaehwiler v. Levine
as 4:2017cv07344
Plaintiff:
Martin A Gaehwiler
Defendant:
Kara Rollins Levine
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wescott v. Martin, et al
as 3:2017cv07330
Plaintiff:
Carl Alexander Wescott
Defendant:
Joseph Martin and Leigh Lightfoot
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1109 Breach of Fiduciary Duties
Sanchez Y Martin, S.A. DE C.V. v. Dos Amigos, Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv01943
Plaintiff:
Sanchez Y Martin, S.A. DE C.V.
Defendant:
Dos Amigos, Inc. , Pablo Paoli and DOES 1-100
Counter_claimant:
Dos Amigos, Inc.
Counter_defendant:
Sanchez Y Martin, S.A. DE C.V. and ROES 1 through 20
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Shim et al v. Lawler et al
as 3:2017cv04920
Plaintiff:
Tae Youn Shim, Ji Taek Kim and Hua Xue
Defendant:
Lawler & Lawler and Martin J. Lawler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Legal Malpractice
Martin et al v. CSAA Insurance Exchange
as 3:2017cv04066
Defendant:
CSAA Insurance Exchange
Plaintiff:
Alicia Martin and Efren Martin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Steve Kim, et al v. Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.
as 3:2017cv01493
Plaintiff:
Steve Kim , Erica S. Laforce , Robert Maciel and others
Defendant:
Volkswagen Group of America Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
