Cases 1 - 7 of 7
DOWNZ v. CITIZENS BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
as 2:2024cv01529
Plaintiff:
BARBARA DOWNZ
Defendant:
CITIZENS BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
WALKER et al v. SENIOR LAW CENTER et al
as 2:2023cv01741
Plaintiff:
MELVIN FRANK WALKER, BISHOP WALKER, MATTHEW WALKER and others
Defendant:
SENIOR LAW CENTER, CITIZENS BANK OF PHILADELPHIA and KAREN BUCK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
ROGERS et al v. CITIZENS BANK, N.A.
as 2:2022cv00456
Plaintiff:
MARY ROGERS, MICHAEL ROGERS and MELISSA TOMASZEWSKI
Defendant:
CITIZENS BANK, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
SELTNER v. CITIZEN BANK OF PENNSYLVANIA, INC. et al
as 2:2019cv04249
Plaintiff:
MARYANN SELTNER
Defendant:
CITIZEN BANK OF PENNSYLVANIA, INC. and CITIZENS FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SOVEREIGN BANK v. COLSON SERVICES CORP.
as 2:2010cv05554
Plaintiff:
SOVEREIGN BANK
Defendant:
COLSON SERVICES CORP.
Counter_claimant:
COLSON SERVICES CORP.
Counter_defendant:
SOVEREIGN BANK
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
COLSON SERVICES CORP.
Thirdparty_defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-X, EAGLE NATIONAL BANK, FIRST CITIZENS BANK AND TRUST COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TNS DIAMONDS, INC. v. CITIZENS BANK OF RHODE ISLAND
as 2:2007cv04229
Plaintiff:
TNS DIAMONDS, INC.
Defendant:
CITIZENS BANK OF RHODE ISLAND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
LATUSZEWSKI, et al v. VALIC FINANCIAL
as 2:2003cv00540
Plaintiff:
GARY LATUSZEWSKI , JAMES ROGAN and REED BIGHAM
Defendant:
VALIC FINANCIAL ADVISORS, INC.
Counter_claimant:
THE VARIABLE ANNUITY LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY and VALIC FINANCIAL ADVISORS, INC.
Counter_defendant:
GARY LATUSZEWSKI , JAMES ROGAN and REED BIGHAM
Garnishee:
LANDMARK FINANCIAL PARTNERS, LLC, PNC BANK, FIRST NIAGRA BANK and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
