Cases 1 - 10 of 424
Williams v. AT&T
as 3:2024cv01386
Plaintiff:
Peggy A Williams
Defendant:
AT&T
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
STX Beef Company, LLC v. Maul et al
as 2:2024cv00129
Plaintiff:
STX Beef Company, LLC
Defendant:
Terry Maul and William Fischer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
McWane, Inc. v. Kenney
as 4:2024cv02008
Plaintiff:
McWane, Inc.
Defendant:
William Kenney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
360 Security Partners, LLC v. Heiser et al
as 3:2024cv01270
Plaintiff:
360 Security Partners, LLC
Defendant:
Marguerite Heiser and William Heiser
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Lim v. Eckert et al
as 4:2024cv00470
Plaintiff:
Khor Chin Lim
Defendant:
Susan Lynn Eckert, City of Chicago, Illinois, Lucien Wong and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
The Bancorp Bank, N.A. v. Williams et al
as 4:2024cv01432
Plaintiff:
The Bancorp Bank, N.A., Assignee of Ascentium Capital, LLC
Defendant:
Tristan Williams and Karlene Rivers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Incorrectly Filed
as 4:2024cv01431
Defendant:
The Bancorp Bank, N.A., Assignee of Ascentium Capital, LLC, Tristan Williams and Karlene Rivers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Williams v. AT&T Inc
as 3:2024cv00835
Plaintiff:
Paola Williams
Defendant:
AT&T, Inc. and AT&T Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
In Re: AT&T Date Breach Litigation.
as 3:2024cv00757
Plaintiff:
Alex Petroski, Andrew March, Nicholas Nelli and others
Defendant:
AT&T Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Moulder et al v. Keller Williams Realty, Inc.
as 5:2024cv00292
Plaintiff:
Jerri L. Moulder and Jerri L. Moulder, P.C.
Defendant:
Keller Williams Realty, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
