Cases 1 - 7 of 7
FADS USA, Inc. v. Joyous Assurance Dance Studios, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv10162
Plaintiff:
FAD USA, Inc., Megadance USA Corp. and FADS USA, Inc.
Defendant:
Danielle O'Neill, Joseph Abe and Joyous Assurance Dance Studios, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Danielle Frankina et al v. Big O Tires, Inc. et al
as 5:2013cv03186
Trustee:
Mohamed Poonja and Fred Hjelmeset
Plaintiff:
Thomas Frankina, Danielle Frankina and Moondance, Inc.
Defendant:
Does 1-25, Big O Tires, Inc. and Big O Tires, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Newport et al v. Burger King Corporation
as 3:2010cv04511
Plaintiff:
Lorraine D. Whitehurst, Allience Inc, Elham Hakimianpour and others
Counter Defendant:
Nasser Aliabadi, Leslie Broadland, Lynn A. Hartje and others
Defendant:
Burger King Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Aussie Pet Mobile Inc v. Daniel L Benton et al
as 8:2009cv01407
Plaintiff:
Aussie Pet Mobile Inc
Defendant:
Daniel L Benton, Tammy Benton, Excelsior Enterprises LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Arthur Murray International, Inc. v. Danielle O'Neill et al
as 2:2009cv01730
Petitioner:
Arthur Murray International, Inc.
Respondent:
Danielle O'Neill and Right Brain, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0009 Petition to Confirm Arbitration Award
Its Just Lunch International LLC v. EAD LLC
as 5:2008cv00391
Plaintiff:
Its Just Lunch International LLC, Its Just Lunch International LLC and Its Just Lunch International LLC
Defendant:
EAD LLC
Counter Defendant:
Daniel Dolan, Irene LaCota and Its Just Lunch International LLC
Counter Claimant:
EAD LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Steven Rust et al v. Budget Blinds, Inc.
as 2:2007cv06893
Plaintiff:
Steven Rust, Leroy Flynn, Madeleine Plante and others
Defendant:
Budget Blinds, Inc., Budget Blinds, Inc. and Budget Blinds, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
