Cases 11 - 17 of 17
United States of America v. 9.3 Acres of Land et al
as 2:2012cv03142
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
9.3 Acres of Land and Heirs And/Or Devisees of Anges L Ritzschke, Deceased
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3131 Public Buildings, Property, and Works (Miller Act)
United States of America v. 9.4 Acres of Land et al
as 2:2012cv03143
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
9.4 Acres of Land, Stanley J Casswell and Jessie Casswell
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3131 Public Buildings, Property, and Works (Miller Act)
United States of America v. 34.6 Acres of Land et al
as 2:2012cv03140
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
34.6 Acres of Land and Hill Revocable Living Trust U/T/D December 22, 2009
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1358 Land Condemnation
United States of America v. 2.559 Acres of Land, more or less, Situate in Stevens County, State of Washington et al
as 2:2012cv00568
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
2.316 Acres of Land, more or less, Situated in Stevens County, State of Washington and Washington, State of
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 258 (a) Public Buildings & Property: Land Condem
United States of America v 0.074 Acres, et al
as 2:2010cv00411
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
0.074 Acres, BNSF Railway Company, State of Washington and others
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 258 (a) Public Buildings & Property: Land Condem
United States of America v. 18 Acres of Land et al
as 3:2009cv05660
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
18 Acres of Land, Daniel W Keller, James F Keller and others
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 258 (a) Public Buildings & Property: Land Condem
United States of America
as 2:2007cv01261
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
10.56 Acres, More or Less,
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 258 (a) Public Buildings & Property: Land Condem
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
