Cases 1 - 10 of 56
Garveykcvn Holdings, LLC v. Phillip Killgore, et al
as 23-55769
Plaintiff / Appellee:
GARVEYKCVN HOLDINGS, LLC
Defendant / Appellant:
PHILLIP KILLGORE, DBA Lavender Massage
Defendant:
DOES, 1 to 100
Garveykcvn Holdings LLC v. Phillip Killgore et al
as 2:2023cv05314
Plaintiff:
GARVEYKCVN HOLDINGS LLC
Defendant:
Phillip Killcore individually and dba Lavender Massage Center, Does 1 to 100 and Phillip Killgore individually and doing business as Lavender Massage Center
Blue Atlantic City View, LP v. Phillips
as 1:2023cv02436
Plaintiff:
Blue Atlantic City View, LP doing business as City View
Defendant:
Guy Phillips
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Solange Rutledge et al v. Invitation Homes et al
as 2:2020cv08790
Plaintiff:
. SOLANGE RUTLEDGE, Cooley Phillip, Phillip Cooley and others
Defendant:
Southern California Edison Company, 2017-2-IH Borrower LP, Does 1 through 10 and others
COOLEY et al
as 2:2020cv08755
Plaintiff:
SOLANGE RUTLEDGE and PHILLIP COOLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
The Park at East Ponce Apartments v. Bradshaw
as 1:2020cv00102
Plaintiff:
The Park at East Ponce Apartments
Defendant:
Phillip Bradshaw
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Avery Park Townhomes et al v. Alatise
as 1:2019cv04053
Plaintiff:
Avery Park Townhomes and The Life Properties LLC
Defendant:
Phillip Alatise
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Temple v. Temple et al
as 1:2019cv03867
Defendant:
Waterton Associates, L.L.C., Brenda C. Temple, Waterton Residential, L.L.C. and others
Plaintiff:
Tandra G. Temple
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Elite Property Management v. Phillips
as 1:2019cv03562
Defendant:
Ishanna Phillips
Plaintiff:
Elite Property Management
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Phillips v. Tucker square apartments
as 1:2019cv03286
Plaintiff:
Ishanna Phillips
Defendant:
Tucker square apartments
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
