Cases 121 - 130 of 152
MOORE et al v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
as 2:2009cv04647
Plaintiff:
GERALD MOORE, GERALD MOORE, GERALD MOORE and others
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
ROCKINGHAM CASUALTY COMPANY v. WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP et al
as 2:2009cv01224
Plaintiff:
ROCKINGHAM CASUALTY COMPANY
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP, VENTURER ELECTRONICS, INC. and ALCO ELECTRONICS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Product Liability
Brunetti's Supermarket v. Piper Products, Inc.
as 3:2009cv01355
Plaintiff:
Brunetti's Supermarket
Defendant:
Piper Products, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SPENCER v. RHODES et al
as 1:2009cv00084
Plaintiff:
HENRY S. SPENCER
Defendant:
JOHN C. RHODES and HOGAN MOTOR LEASING, INC.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
BENEDICT et al v. SPRINGFIELD MALL POST OFFICE
as 2:2009cv00864
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
GREATER NEW YORK MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY v. ELECTROLUX
as 2:2009cv00698
Plaintiff:
GREATER NEW YORK MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
ELECTROLUX
Cause Of Action: Diversity
RUSSELL v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
as 2:2009cv00390
Plaintiff:
SHIRLEY M RUSSELL
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
LICIAGA v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
as 2:2009cv00391
Plaintiff:
CARMEN LICIAGA
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
RAMIREZ v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
as 2:2009cv00389
Plaintiff:
LUCY RAMIREZ
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
POORMAN v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
as 2:2009cv00387
Plaintiff:
BERNICE POORMAN
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
