Cases 1 - 9 of 9
THE BOROUGH OF EMMAUS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 5:2022cv01539
Plaintiff:
THE BOROUGH OF EMMAUS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, BUCKEYE FIRE EQUIPMENT CO., CARRIER GLOBAL CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
MUNICIPAL AUTHORITY OF WESTMORELAND COUNTY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 2:2022cv00519
Plaintiff:
MUNICIPAL AUTHORITY OF WESTMORELAND COUNTY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, BUCKEYE FIRE EQUIPMENT CO., CARRIER GLOBAL CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 pl Petition for Removal - Product Liability
THE BOROUGH OF AMBLER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 2:2022cv00138
Plaintiff:
THE BOROUGH OF AMBLER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, BUCKEYE FIRE EQUIPMENT CO., CARRIER GLOBAL CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
FIERRO v. DOE 1 et al
as 2:2012cv02849
Plaintiff:
SHELIA FIERRO
Defendant:
JOHN DOE 1, JOHN DOE 2, JOHN DOE 3 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
PESJAR v. GLAXOSMITHKLINE, LLC et al
as 2:2012cv02848
Plaintiff:
RODERICK PESJAR
Defendant:
GLAXOSMITHKLINE, LLC , JOHN DOE 1, JOHN DOE 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RULL v. JOHN DOE 1 et al
as 2:2012cv02852
Plaintiff:
CARIDAD RULL
Defendant:
JOHN DOE 1, JOHN DOE 2, JOHN DOE 3 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
STOEHER v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION et al
as 2:2012cv02846
Plaintiff:
RONAL STOEHER
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION, JOHN DOE 1, JOHN DOE 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PABON v. JOHN DOE 1 et al
as 2:2012cv02851
Plaintiff:
THANIA PABON
Defendant:
JOHN DOE 1, JOHN DOE 2, JOHN DOE 3 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FARLEY v. GLAXOSMITHKLINE, LLC et al
as 2:2012cv02847
Plaintiff:
ANNIE FARLEY
Defendant:
GLAXOSMITHKLINE, LLC , JOHN DOE 1, JOHN DOE 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
