Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Melbardis et al v. CRH Medical Corporation
as 3:2024cv00090
Defendant:
Well Health USA, Well Health Technologies, Corp, CRH Medical Corp and others
Plaintiff:
David Melbardis and Karen Melbardis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Lesizza v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv02435
Plaintiff:
Diana Lesizza
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc., Bard Access Systems, Inc., Becton, Dickinson and Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
Sampuda et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 1:2012cv01156
Plaintiff:
CARLA SAMPUDA , GEORGE SAMPUDA , PEGGY PERRY and others
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation and Does 1-40
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gross et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 1:2012cv01157
Plaintiff:
Theresa Gross , Joyce Heffernan , Leigh Leal and others
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson, Ethicon, Inc., ETHICON SARL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SCHULTZ et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation et al
as 2:2012cv02575
Plaintiff:
KATHERINE SCHULTZ , ROBERT SCHULTZ SR , REBECCA BERRY and others
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation and Does 1-40
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FLOWERS et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 2:2012cv02571
Plaintiff:
LISA FLOWERS and KEITH FLOWERS
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson, Ethicon, Inc., ETHICON SARL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sampuda et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2012cv01156
Plaintiff:
CARLA SAMPUDA , GEORGE SAMPUDA , PEGGY PERRY and others
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation and Does 1-40
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Anderson et al v. Rettig et al.
as 2:2012cv02560
Plaintiff:
MARGIE ANDERSON , HAZEL RETTIG , DEBRA CHAPMAN and others
Defendant:
AMERICAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC., AMERICAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS, HOLDINGS, INC., ENDO PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
