Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Dorron et al v. Union Pacific Railroad Company et al
as 3:2015cv00309
Plaintiff:
Sandra Dorron, Estate of Lulu Bookman, Rodolfo C. Garza and others
Movant:
Benjamin Hernandez, Aurelio Martinez, Cecilia Martinez and others
Defendant:
Kinder Morgan G.P., Inc., Kinder Morgan Operating L.P. "D", SFPP, L.P. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Davis et al v. Union Pacific Railroad Company et al
as 3:2015cv00261
Plaintiff:
Betty L. Davis, Clarence J. Schexnayder and William Earle Wood
Defendant:
Kinder Morgan G.P., Inc., Kinder Morgan Operating L.P. "D", SFPP, L.P. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Dorron et al v. Union Pacific Railroad Company et al
as 4:2015cv02079
Plaintiff:
Sandra Dorron , Estate of Lulu Bookman , Rodolfo C. Garza and others
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company, SFPP, L.P., Kinder Morgan Operating L.P. "D and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
New Mexico Smelter and Refining, Inc. v. Union Pacific Railroad Company, et al.
as 2:2015cv00514
Plaintiff:
New Mexico Smelter and Refining , Inc.
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company , SFPP, L.P., Kinder Morgan Operating L.P. "D and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Durazno Street Partners, L.P., on behalf of itself and all others similiarly situated v. Union Pacific Railroad Company et al
as 3:2015cv00177
Plaintiff:
Durazno Street Partners, L.P., on behalf of itself and all others similiarly situated
Defendant:
Kinder Morgan G.P., Inc., Kinder Morgan Operating L.P. "D", SFPP, L.P. (formerly known as Santa Fe Pacific Pipelines, Inc.) and others
Notice Only Party:
Alfonzo Perez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
SFPP, L.P. v. Union Pacific Railroad Company et al
as 2:2015cv01954
Defendant:
Does and Union Pacific Railroad Company
Counter Defendant:
SFPP, L.P.
Plaintiff:
SFPP, L.P.
Counter Claimant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
