Assault, Libel, and Slander Cases filed in Massachusetts
Cases 21 - 30 of 33
Aby v. City of Cambridge et al
as 1:2014cv13256
Plaintiff: Laetitia Aby
Defendant: City of Cambridge, Cambridge Police Department, David Serino and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Khan v. GO DADDY, LLC et al
as 1:2013cv10344
Plaintiff: M Khalid Khan
Defendant: GO DADDY, LLC and John Does 1 through 10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Autism Intervention Specialists, LLC et al v. Best
as 1:2012cv11647
Plaintiff: Autism Intervention Specialists, LLC and Nassim Aoude
Defendant: John Best
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Baker et al v. Does 1-10 We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2012cv10434
Plaintiff: Clark Baker and Office of Medical & Scientific Justice Inc.
Defendant: John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Euclid Discoveries LLC et al v. Nelson et al
as 1:2011cv11393
Plaintiff: Euclid Discoveries LLC , J. Robert Werner and Richard Y. Wingard
Defendant: Mark Nelson , Sachin Garg and John Does 1- 150
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Joslin v. Hampshire County House of Corrections et al
as 3:2011cv30175
Plaintiff: John A. Joslin
Defendant: Hampshire County House of Corrections, Hampden CountyHouse of Corrections and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doe v. Gregory
as 1:2011cv10372
Plaintiff: John Doe
Defendant: Christian C. Gregory
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Piccone et al v. Bartels et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2011cv10143
Plaintiff: Colleen C Piccone and Peter V. Quaglia
Defendant: John W. Bartels, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Piccone et al v. Bartels et al
as 1:2011cv10143
Plaintiff: Colleen C Piccone and Peter V. Quaglia
Defendant: John W. Bartels, Jr. , Dalton Police Department and Town of Dalton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cronin v. John Doe
as 1:2010cv10810
Plaintiff: James Cronin
Defendant: John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?