Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Loftis v. State of Oregon et al
as 3:2022cv01261
Plaintiff:
Natasha Loftis
Defendant:
State of Oregon, Colette Peters, Paula Myers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marquez v. Gibson, et al.
as 3:2019cv01130
Defendant:
John Does 1-25 and Joseph Gibson
Plaintiff:
Luis Marquez and Luis Enrique Marquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cooke v. Yates et al
as 6:2017cv00943
Defendant:
Regina 'Doe', Zig 'Doe', Jane Doe 2 and others
Plaintiff:
David L. Cooke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Rahman et al v. Barnett et al
as 1:2015cv00388
Defendant:
Yolanda Barnett and John/Jane Does I-X
Plaintiff:
Asad Rahman and Nelda St. Clair
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Accuardi v. Fredericks
as 3:2013cv01825
Plaintiff:
F. Antone Anthony Accuardi
Defendant:
Brad Fredericks and John & Jane Doe 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Galena Biopharma, Inc. v. Ioannides et al
as 3:2013cv01745
Defendant:
Does 1-10 inclusive and Constantin Ioannides
Plaintiff:
Galena Biopharma, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Gonzales v. Brown et al
as 1:2013cv01206
Defendant:
Tom Adams, Mel Brown, City of Madras and others
Plaintiff:
Luis Jimenez Gonzales
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mahler v. Titrud et al
as 6:2013cv00752
Defendant:
Bernard Bednarz, Does 1-20, National Congress of State Games and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Evans Mahler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Matot v. Does 1-5
as 6:2013cv00153
Defendant:
Does 1-5
Plaintiff:
Adam Matot
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Corrinet v. Burke et al
as 6:2011cv06416
Defendant:
Rusty Burke, Bill Cavalier, Does 1-25 and others
541) 563-7297 (fax:
Mark Steven Corrinet
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
