Cases 161 - 170 of 882
SMITH v. CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC. et al
as 2:2016cv02198
Plaintiff:
JERRY SMITH
Defendant:
CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC. and FRITZ-RUMER-COOKE, CO., INC.
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
CUMMINGS v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION
as 2:2016cv02142
Plaintiff:
LARRY CUMMINGS
Defendant:
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Leshinski v. Delaware and Hudson Railway Company, Inc.
as 3:2016cv00603
Plaintiff:
Paul Leshinski
Defendant:
Delaware and Hudson Railway Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 151
FOX v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION
as 2:2016cv01681
Plaintiff:
JAMES FOX
Defendant:
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
TERRY v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION
as 2:2016cv01431
Plaintiff:
KELVALUST TERRY
Defendant:
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
COLEMAN v. JOHNSON et al
as 2:2016cv01348
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER M. COLEMAN
Defendant:
JEH CHARLES JOHNSON, TRANSPORTATION SECURITY ADMINISTRATION (TSA), THE OFFICE OF PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY APPELLATE BORD (OPRAB) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
HUDSON v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION (AMTRAK)
as 2:2016cv00096
Plaintiff:
CRYSTAL HUDSON
Defendant:
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION (AMTRAK)
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
COLLIER et al v. CSX TRANSPORTATION INC.
as 2:2015cv06823
Plaintiff:
JAMES S. COLLIER and MARY ELIZABETH COLLIER
Defendant:
CSX TRANSPORTATION INC.
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
CLARKE v. SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY (SEPTA)
as 2:2015cv06253
Plaintiff:
MICHELLE CLARKE
Defendant:
SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY (SEPTA)
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
ROBINSON v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION
as 2:2015cv05652
Plaintiff:
NETTIE ROBINSON
Defendant:
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
