Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Proto v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation
as 3:2018cv00631
Plaintiff:
George Proto
Defendant:
National Railroad Passenger Corporation
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Anderson v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation
as 3:2017cv02104
Plaintiff:
Jad Anderson
Defendant:
National Railroad Passenger Corporation
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Caccamo v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation
as 3:2017cv00471
Plaintiff:
Vincent Caccamo
Defendant:
National Railroad Passenger Corporation
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Dumas v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation
as 3:2016cv01527
Plaintiff:
Dwight Dumas
Defendant:
National Railroad Passenger Corporation
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Herlihy v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation
as 3:2016cv01379
Plaintiff:
William Herlihy
Defendant:
National Railroad Passenger Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Simpson v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation
as 3:2016cv00816
Plaintiff:
Dion Simpson
Defendant:
National Railroad Passenger Corporation
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Trindade v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation et al
as 3:2016cv00512
Plaintiff:
Helio Trindade
Defendant:
National Railroad Passenger Corporation and Trees, Inc.
Cross_claimant:
National Railroad Passenger Corporation
Cross_defendant:
Trees, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Tuscano v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation - Amtrak
as 3:2015cv01626
Plaintiff:
Dean Tuscano
Defendant:
National Railroad Passenger Corporation - Amtrak
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Tardiff v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation
as 3:2015cv00209
Plaintiff:
Randy L. Tardiff
Defendant:
National Railroad Passenger Corporation
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Poulton v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation
as 3:2014cv01823
Plaintiff:
Gerald Poulton
Defendant:
National Railroad Passenger Corporation
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
