Cases 11 - 20 of 87
HADEN v. ANDREWS et al
as 3:2022cv03403
Plaintiff:
BROOKE A. HADEN
Defendant:
JAMES W. ANDREWS, JOHN/JANE DOES 1-10 and ABC CORPORATIONS 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
RAMOS et al v. FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION et al
as 2:2021cv20716
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM RAMOS and MIGDALIA CONCEPCION
Defendant:
FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION, ABC CORPORATIONS 1-100 and JOHN/JANE DOES 1-100
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
STARLING et al v. RECALDE et al
as 2:2021cv20614
Plaintiff:
LORRAINE STARLING
Defendant:
OSWALDO RECALDE, COWAN SYSTEMS, LLC, MICHIKO WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
DOWLING v. FARRELL et al
as 2:2021cv20508
Plaintiff:
ANGELA D DOWLING
Defendant:
WILLIAM FARRELL and JOHN/JANE DOES 1-5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DOWLING v. FARRELL et al
as 2:2021cv20505
Plaintiff:
ANGELA D DOWLING
Defendant:
WILLIAM FARRELL and JOHN/JANE DOES 1-5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BAUTISTA et al v. SHUTTLESWORTH et al
as 3:2021cv17280
Plaintiff:
Alvin Bautista and MARIA T. BAUTISTA
Defendant:
Maria T Bautista, WILLIAM A SHUTTLESWORTH, New Bern Transit Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
SASAN et al v. JOSEPH et al
as 2:2021cv16689
Plaintiff:
YIGAL SASAN and SAMIRA SASAN
Defendant:
WILFRED JOSEPH, SMITH TRANSPORT, INC., JOHN/JANE DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
GONZALEZ v. ALMEIDA et al
as 1:2021cv15564
Plaintiff:
JAILEEN GONZALEZ
Defendant:
RENE ALMEIDA and JOHN/JANE DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
DEAN v. KAPANADZE et al
as 3:2021cv14561
Plaintiff:
NICOLE DEAN
Defendant:
MALKAHZI KAPANADZE, GOLDEN FISH LOGISTIC SOLUTIONS, LTD, JOHN/JANE DOE 1-100 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
DIAZ v. PRUENAL et al
as 1:2021cv14266
Plaintiff:
MARIA E. DIAZ
Defendant:
ANDREW P. PRUENAL, WATSONTOWN TRUCKING COMPANY, INC., WATSON TRUCKING COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
